Site icon sheeplywolves

Meadows: Trump Met With Several Congress Members on Fraud, Will ‘Fight Back:’ Epoch Times

U.S. President Donald Trump talks with Reuters White House correspondent Steve Holland as they walk down the West Wing colonnade with White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows before an interview with Reuters about China, the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and other subjects in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, U.S., April 29, 2020. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

The following article was copied and pasted from my Epoch Times electronic subscription to display their reporting and concern for truth and facts, and to inform on topics not covered by mainstream and social media.

 

Meadows: Trump Met With Several Congress Members on Fraud, Will ‘Fight Back’

December 21, 2020 Updated: December 21, 2020
biggersmaller

White House chief of staff Mark Meadows said President Donald Trump met with several members of Congress on alleged voter fraud and will “fight back.”

“Several members of Congress just finished a meeting in the Oval Office with President [Trump],” he wrote on Twitter, adding that they are “preparing to fight back against mounting evidence of voter fraud. Stay tuned.”

Meadows, in his Monday night tweet, did not elaborate on who the members of Congress might be or their strategy.

Trump has not conceded the race and has said that fraud and irregularities cost him the election. The Epoch Times has not declared a winner in the race.

In recent days, Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) and other House members have indicated they would challenge certain states’ Electoral College votes when they are read during the Joint Session of Congress on Jan. 6. Last week, the Republican parties in states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada voted on their own slates of electors to preserve Trump’s ability to file lawsuits.

On Monday, Brooks told The Epoch Times that the “only thing that will get the congressmen and senators to do what is right for our country on this issue of voter fraud and election theft is active participation by American citizens who want honest and accurate elections.”

“Now, can American citizens actively participate? Very simply, they have to call their congressmen and their senators and demand that they support this effort to protect our election system from fraud and illegal conduct,” he said.

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) in an interview with “American Thought Leaders.” (The Epoch Times)

One member of the Senate and one member of the House are needed to challenge a state’s Electoral College votes. No senator has definitely confirmed they would challenge the votes, although Sen.-elect Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) have both suggested they might join Brooks and other GOP House representatives.

After Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) acknowledged Democratic nominee Joe Biden as the winner several days ago, he also reportedly told senators not to challenge the counting of the Electoral College votes in January.

But Brooks said that McConnell’s comments aren’t relevant because it’s about alleged fraud and election integrity, not optics.

“Are members of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate going to support or acquiesce to voter fraud and election theft or are they going to fight it, bearing in mind that our election system is the underpinning of our republic?” he asked. “If you do not have an honest and accurate election system, you have no Republic.”

And Paul, for his part, told a Senate Homeland Security hearing that he believes there was fraud committed during the Nov. 3 election.

“We can’t just say [fraud] didn’t happen,” Paul said. “We’re just going to ignore it? We’re going to sweep it under the rug?”

The Kentucky Republican also asserted that few courts and judges dismissed election-related lawsuits based on their merits—but rather, they were dismissed on procedural grounds.

“The courts have not decided the facts,” Paul said last Wednesday in the hearing. “The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections, and they stayed out of it by finding an excuse.”

Ivan Pentchoukov contributed to this report.

Exit mobile version