A new pre-print systematic review in The Lancet has found a “high likelihood” of causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death.

The review, conducted through autopsy and post-mortem analysis, discovered that a majority of deaths studied occurred within a week from the last vaccine administration and suggests “a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.”

The researchers initially identified 678 studies, but the final review included 44 papers, containing 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case.

“Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death,” the paper reads.

The review found that the most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system, contributing to 53% of the deaths, followed by the hematological system at 17%, the respiratory system at 8%, and multiple organ systems at 7%.

“Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases,” the authors confirmed.

The mean time from vaccination to death was found to be 14.3 days.

Of the deaths studied, “a total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”

The researchers highlighted the “consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death.”

The scientists leading the study have urged for additional examination of the data to fully understand the potential implications of their findings.

“Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings,” they expressed.

The authors of the review have shared their findings as a pre-print, meaning it has not yet been officially peer-reviewed, a process that ensures studies are scientifically valid and meaningful.

This preprint has been removed from public viewing by Preprints with The Lancet “because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology,” according to the journal’s website.

No further explanation was given.

However, the study originates from a collaboration involving esteemed institutions including the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor’s School of Public Health, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Yale School of Public Health, Alberta Health Services’ CancerControl Alberta, and The Wellness Company.

Thirty-year Texas emergency room physician Dr. Richard Bartlett believes that promoting COVID vaccines as “safe and effective” is unethical and immoral.

He emphasizes the importance of informed consent for physicians according to the American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics.

“I consider the ‘safe and effective’ propaganda messaging unethical and immoral,” he said of coronavirus vaccines. “Informed consent is an obligation for physicians per the AMA Code of Medical Ethics.”

He cites a growing body of evidence worldwide revealing risks, disabilities, and deaths associated with the vaccines, highlighting the banning of the AstraZeneca vaccine in 22 countries and the recommendation of the J&J vaccine as a “last resort” due to its safety.

“A tremendous body of evidence is currently available. New data is published weekly from around the world confirming absolute risk, disability and death for many associated with the COVID injections,” Bartlett said. “The AstraZeneca COVID shot was outlawed in 22 nations because it was that ‘safe and effective.’ The J&J Jansen COVID shot was recommended as a last resort because it was that ‘safe and effective.’”

Furthermore, Dr. Bartlett mentions the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) release of 1,200 adverse events related to the Pfizer vaccine following a court order, suggesting that the truth about the vaccines is being revealed.

“The FDA released the 1200 Pfizer shot side effects (adverse events of special interest) because a Federal Judge ordered the FDA to release the data,” the former advisor to then-Texas Governor Rick Perry’s Health Disparities Task Force said. “The truth is coming out.”

Dr. James Thorp, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist and maternal-fetal medicine physician, took to Twitter on Thursday to confront “all you misguided, misinformed, brainwashed & ignorant physicians, healthcare systems & general global population” in light of the review’s findings.

“[T]his is EXACTLY why you foolishly believe in the C19 vaccines when they were designed to make u infertile, injure you and kill you,” Dr. Thorp wrote.

“He who pays the piper calls the tunes. And this is YOUR government with YOUR tax dollars that attempted to BURY Pfizer’s lethal data for 75 years and then in early 2021 rollout a $13 BILLION BRIBE PSYOPS CAMPAIGN designed by Dep Sec Mark Weber of HHS – a 5th generation warfare designed to promote the safety, effectiveness and NECESSITY IN PREGNANCY. Nuremberg 2.0 PLEASE.”

You can read the full review below:

A peer-reviewed study published last month in the journal Open Forum Infectious Diseases confirmed that the risk of contracting COVID-19 is higher among those who have received more COVID vaccines.

The study evaluated whether bivalent coronavirus vaccines—the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna formulations—could protect against the virus.

The risk of contracting the disease “varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received,” the study authors write. “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19.”